SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 784

S.K.AGARWAL
G. P. S. RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) – Respondent


S. K. Agarwal

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Section 438 Cr. P. C. read with Section 482 Cr. P. C. for anticipatory bail in the case FIR No. 236/2000 under Sections 420/467/471/448/120b IPC P. S. Inderpuri. 1. Facts in brief are that Tapan Lahiri lodged a report alleging that he was defrauded by the petitioner for forging documents of flat No. A-83,, Inderpuri, New delhi (hereinafter, "the flat"); that in 1992 he purchased the flat in the name of his firm Kaspat Exports for Rs. 1,95,000. 00 from M/s. Cubical Constructions Private ltd. ; that he procured a bank loan from the Bank of baroda for business purposes and submitted the original property papers of the flat to the bank as a security. The petitioner was earlier his landlord and had some business dealing with him. Because of the financial constraints he could not re-pay the loan to the bank as a result of which the bank instituted a suit for recovery in the Debt Recovery Tribunal. He had left Delhi and proceeded ex parte; on enquiries from the bank, petitioner moved an application before the DRT for being impleaded as a party to the proceedings stating that he was the sole owner of the said flat and that the complainant had exe







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top