SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 631

SHARDA AGGARWAL
MAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED – Respondent


SHARDA AGGARWAL

( 1 ). The petitioners have moved the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for interim relief. Petitioner No. 1 is a Company in the field of manufacturing of all types of summer and winter cloth having a turn over of more than Rs. 300. 00 crores. Petitioner No. 2 M/s Sandhya Textiles is duly constituted as institutional coordinator representing petitioner No. 1 company specifically for the tender floated by Mahanagar telephone Nigam Ltd. (for short MTNL), the respondent. Reference to the petitioner would hereinafter mean petitioner No. 1.

( 2 ). MTNL invited tenders from those who had minimum turn over of rupees three hundred crores for supply of cloth for summer and winter uniforms for Group c and d of its employees. Notice inviting tenders (NIT) was for cloth for the following five types of uniforms:- sl. NO ,. items Approximateindicative quantity (In (Rs) Per meters) mtrs. 1. Cloth for shirts 330816 70-77 (Summer ) 2. Cloth for Pants 129225 260-270 (Summer ) 3. Pants and coats 187101. 375 (woollen cloths for winter ) 4. a) Sarees with blouse 9180 sets 459. 90 (Summer) , b) Suites w




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top