SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 870

MANMOHAN SARIN
JAYALAKSHMI JAITLY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) PETITIONER, Ms. Jayalakshmi, Jaitly, has filed this writ petition, seeking quashing of the orders dated 14. 9. 2001, 12. 10. 2001, 9. 11. 2001, 29. 11. 2001, 11. 12. 2001, 16. 1. 2002 and 22. 1. 2002, passed by the respondent Commission, namely. Justice K. Venkataswami Commission of Inquiry. The above orders are concerned primarily with the authenticity of the tapes, the request for their forensic examination and the order in which the witnesses and 8-B noticees are to be examined.

( 2 ) PETITIONER, additionally, seeks an order for referring the alleged unedited camera original tapes of approx 105 hours duration for forensic examination by independent experts or a direction to the Commission to the same effect. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondent Commission to examine Mr. Mathew Samuel, Mr. Tarun Tejpal and Mr. Annirudh Bahai, 8-B noticees, prior to her examination. Petitioner had also prayed for provision of authentic and accurate transcripts of the tapes by independent experts, after forensic examination of the tapes being carried out. In this connection, it is to be noted that transcription of tapes having been undertaken under the supervision











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top