SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 890

MANMOHAN SARIN
J. R. PARASHAR – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA – Respondent


MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) ALONG with two other advocates has filed CW no. 647/2001 seeking a mandamus for enforcement of Chapter IV of Bar Council of india Rules 1975 framed under S. 49 (l) (gg) of the Advocates Act 1961, which prescribes the form of dress or robe to be worn by advocates. An order of restraint is also sought against the senior advocates from wearing what Is described as the Queens Counsel (QC), gown contrary to the above rule. The petitioners case in brief is that the relevant rule prescribes the same dress for all advocates. Senior advocates therefore cannot wear the QC gown as also the short coat or jacket decorated with frills and fineries, to make out a different class of advocates.

( 2 ) CW No. 1959/2001 has been filed by the Lawyers Reformist Forum, through Its president Shri K. L. Rathee, seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain the Senior Advocates wearing the Queens counsel gown, contrary to the Bar Council Rule and to direct all advocates Including senior advocates to wear the dress or robe as prescribed under the Rule. The forum claims to be a Society with the object of promoting ethical standards in the profession and to ensure the availability of legal servic


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top