SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1016

TARA CHAND – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI – Respondent


S. B. SINHA

( 1 ) BOTH these writ applications involving common questions of fact and law were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. FACTS: -

( 2 ) THE Complainant Mr. Prubjit Singh Manku, a holder of British passport bearing No. 015538198 along with his relative Mr. T. S. Jitla was going to jaipur from Indira Ghandhi International Airport. They were stopped on the way by the respondents who checked their luggage and put them under threat of arrest; whereafter allegedly a sum of 35 pounds was extorted from them.

( 3 ) ON the basis of the said complaint, the Respondent No. 2 by an order dated 6. 10. 1997 initiated a departmental proceeding against the Petitioners wherein the inquiry officer examined P. W.- 1, Constable Devis V. J. and P. W.- 2, Trilok Singh Titla but the complainant Prubjit Singh Manku did not appear before the Enquiry Officer.

( 4 ) THE Petitioner on 14. 5. 1998 in response to the notice to show- cause submitted his written statement stating that the taxi vide No. DLT - 3808 ,of mr. Mahinder Singh, Taxi Driver broke down and the Police Control Room (PCR) driver allegedly helped him.

( 5 ) THE inquiry officer in his report da








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top