SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1026

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKUI CHANDRA, S.P.AGARWAL, Sangita CHANDRA

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

( 1 ) THE petitioners have filed the present petition aggrieved by the size of the alternative plot made available to them under the large scale acquisition, development and disposal of land in delhi in 1961.

( 2 ) THE petitioners were owning approximately 45 bighas of land in respect of notifications were issued under section 4 of the Land Acquisition act, 1884 in 1957 and 1959 and under section 6 in 1961. A scheme known as Large Scale Acquisition, development and Disposal of Land in Delhi, 1961 was propounded on 2. 5. 1961 for rehabilitation of persons whose land was acquired as an additional measure apart from the compensation paid to such persons. Para 3 of the scheme states that residential plots to be leased out should not exceed 800 sq. yds and the size of the plot has to be determined by the Chief Commissioner taking into consideration the area and the value. of the land acquired from the individual vis-a-vis the location and value of the plot to be allotted in terms of para 8 (i) (a) of the scheme.

( 3 ) THE case of the petitioners was processed by the Delhi Administration and letter dated 27. 6. 1981 was issued to respondent No. 2 DDA recommending the ca



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top