SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1051

K.S.GUPTA
BRITISH INDIA CORPORATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
FIRM ANAND PARKASH OM PARKASH – Respondent


K. S. Gupta, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF filed this suit alleging that it is a limited liability company and has one mill known as Cawnpore Woollen Mill at Kanpur and another mill known as New Fgerton Woollen Mill at Uhariwal. PC jain is authorised to sign and verify the plaint and institute suit on behalt of plaintiff- corporation Both the mills manufacture woollen goods. Defendant No 1 had been a partneiship firm having defendants 2 to 4,8 to 10, Suresh Kumar Goyal and Om prakash Goyal, deceased as its partners. Defendant No. 1 had been buying woollen goods from the said two mills. The plaintiff in the accounts maintained at Kanpur and Dhariwal of said two mills debited the price of woollen goods purchased by defendant No. 1 and other expenses including cost of samples and bank charges. Similarly, amounts paid by defendant No. 1 or any other credits granted to it on account of dealings between the parties, were credited in the said accounts In the account books of plaintiffs Cawnpore Woollen Mills from 16th june, 1964 upto 31st december, 1964, Rs. 22,37,049. 77 were debited. Aggregate amount credited in that account was Rs. 13,04,356. 98 leaving a balance of Rs. 9,32,692. 79 which was tak





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top