B.A.KHAN, J.D.KAPOOR
AMRITLAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition was dismissed by order dated 5. 4. 2002 for non-prosecution. Petitioner thereafter filed c. M. 4968/2002 for its restoration, while this application was being considered, both parties agreed for disposal of this petition on merits.
( 2 ) PETITIONER a Class-11 contractor was registered with CPWD in 1991. His enlistment was revalidated from time to time and last such revalidation ended on 28. 2. 2001. He sought its extension but respondents refused to grant it on the ground that he had failed to obtain requisite marks in terms of procedure provided for such revalidation under Office Memorandum (in short o. M. ) dated 27. 6. 1995. Feeling aggrieved he has filed this petition on the ground that respondent had wrongly assessed his performance and declined revalidation of enlistment.
( 3 ) THE procedure for revalidation of enlistment has been broadly mentioned in O. M. dated 27. 6. 1995. Under the aforesaid O. M. , a contractor is required to submit along with his application a list of all the works executed/completed or in progress which for Class-II (Bandr) contractor is Rs. 25 lakhs and above during the last five years in CPWD. He is required to secur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.