SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1295

M.A.KHAN
PRATISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P.Mavi, PAVAN SHARMA

Mahmood Ali Khan

( 1 ) ON 10. 11. 1998 Sanjay Kumar Sharma, the complainant who was running a travel agency, lodged a complaint that one Ravi called him on telephone that his (complainant s) travel agency had provided a car to him in Manali with one driver Bittoo and he requested for providing a Tata Sumo car. The complainant sent it on 30. 10. 1998 with driver Jagdev. The driver informed him that they were moving about in Delhi and on the next day they would go to Rajaethan. But nothing was heard for next 4/5 day. On inquiry he also found that no person by the name of Ravi was living in Preet vihar address which was given on telephone. He suspected that the driver had run away with the vehicle. Case was registered at P. S. Samaipur Badli. On 01. 9. 2000 satish Kumar and Abhishek Babu were arrested by a police officer in a case registered at P. S. Seelampur on the secret information that they wanted to sell stolen motorcycle. During interrogation they disclosed that they had committed theft of the motorcycle in complicity with their assaociate Rahul @mohan Shorab and sudhir Mohan Jha about 15-20 daye before from Preet vihar. On 01. 10. 2000 the confeaaional atatement of the accuaed





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top