SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1336

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
VINA MUKHI – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BANKEY BIHARI, R.K.SAINI

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

( 1 )

( 2 ) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal.

( 3 ) THE petitioner registered under the New Pattern registration Scheme, 1979 for allotment of a MIG flat. The address given was of Alwar since at that time the husband of the petitioner who was in the Army was posted in the Madras Regiment.

( 4 ) THE petitioner shifted residence in 1990 and 1993 first to Noida and then to Delhi and gave last address as Flat No. 219, Sector-A, Pocket-C, Vaaant kunj, New Delhi. The petitioner states that she visited office of the respondent sometimes in 1998 since she received no intimation about any allotment of flat and was surprised to know from the dealing assistant that a flat bearing No. 62-A, Group-IV, phase-II, Pocket-I, Kondli Gharoli was allotted to the petitioner in November, 1996 but the same was sent to the. petitioner at the old address at Alwar. The petitioner made a representation dated 14th May, 1998 for issuance of the allotment-cum-demand letter since the same had been sent at the old address despite intimation by the petitioner. The petitioner claims that the respondent refused to oblige and thus the petitione


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top