SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1493

A.K.SIKRI, S.B.SINHA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK GURNANI, K.N.Rai, SANJAY JAIN

( 1 ) BY this writ petition, the petitioner, which is Union of India, has challenged the validity of the order dated 31. 1. 2001 passed by the Central Administrative tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O. A. 1033/2000. By means of that order o. A. filed by the respondent herein has been allowed. The main thrust of the petition is that by the impugned order a go-bye has been given to the rules and it has been tried to unsettle and disturb the existing seniority of persons who have been working for a long period in certain posts and are relegated to the position junior to respondents 2 and 3.

( 2 ) DURING the period of 1968-70 respondent Nos. 2 and 3 joined the Central forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL, for short ). They were promoted as SSO grade I from 9. 8. 1985. They became eligible for the next promotion post as Principal scientific Officer (PSO, for short) in 1990, as an officer with five years regular service as SSO becomes eligible for promotion to the next higher post of PSO. As no DPC was held for considering respondents 2 and 3 for this post, they filed OA 409/91. In this O. A. respondents 2 and 3 filed M. A. 1242/91 as well. This MA was disposed of on 24. 4. 1991 on t

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top