SHARDA AGGARWAL
PURNIMA DHAWAN – Appellant
Versus
AGMOZ ONLINE PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of the plaintiffs application under Order 39 Rule 10, CPC (IA. No. 8843/2001) for directions to the defendants to pay the rental arrears/ damages/mesne profits and the defendants application under Section 151, cpc (IA. No. 3521/2002) for modification of order dated 20th March, 2002 passed in CCP. No. 37/2002 and order dated 19th October, 2001 passed on the application under Order 39 Rule 10, CPC. By this order, I also propose to dispose of the contempt petition (CCP. 37/2002 ).
( 2 ) IN the suit for ejectment and recovery of rent, the plaintiffs have alleged that premises in question being the ground floor of the building D-302, Defence colony, New Delhi were let out to the defendant company on payment of Rs. 40,000/- as monthly rent (Rs. 25,000/- towards rent + Rs. 15,000/- towards watch and ward) w. e. f. 1st July, 2000 by virtue of unregistered lease agreement dated 29th June, 2000 and watch and ward agreement of the same date. The relationship of the parties is not disputed nor the execution of the two agreements is in dispute. The fact that interest free security deposit of Rs. 1,60,000/-, refundable at the time of vacation of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.