SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1305

SHARDA AGGARWAL
PURNIMA DHAWAN – Appellant
Versus
AGMOZ ONLINE PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN KHOSLA, Viraj Datar

Sharda Aggarwal

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of the plaintiffs application under Order 39 Rule 10, CPC (IA. No. 8843/2001) for directions to the defendants to pay the rental arrears/ damages/mesne profits and the defendants application under Section 151, cpc (IA. No. 3521/2002) for modification of order dated 20th March, 2002 passed in CCP. No. 37/2002 and order dated 19th October, 2001 passed on the application under Order 39 Rule 10, CPC. By this order, I also propose to dispose of the contempt petition (CCP. 37/2002 ).

( 2 ) IN the suit for ejectment and recovery of rent, the plaintiffs have alleged that premises in question being the ground floor of the building D-302, Defence colony, New Delhi were let out to the defendant company on payment of Rs. 40,000/- as monthly rent (Rs. 25,000/- towards rent + Rs. 15,000/- towards watch and ward) w. e. f. 1st July, 2000 by virtue of unregistered lease agreement dated 29th June, 2000 and watch and ward agreement of the same date. The relationship of the parties is not disputed nor the execution of the two agreements is in dispute. The fact that interest free security deposit of Rs. 1,60,000/-, refundable at the time of vacation of the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top