SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1624

DALVEER BHANDARI, H.R.MALHOTRA
AMITABH VARINA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK ARORA, DIPAK DHINGRA, Ravinder Chadha, Saurabh Chauhan

DALVEER BHANDARI

( 1 ) IT is alleged that, the petitioner under most extraordinary circumstances has filed this petition with the prayer that the respondents be directed to register an FIR under Section 323, 327,347, 352, 356,365,379,384,392,420 and 506 IPC. It is also prayed that on the basis of the petitioner s complaints dated 28. 6. 2002 and 1. 7. 2002 Investigation be carried out and action be taken In accordance with law. It is also prayed that the petitioner be awarded exemplary costs and compensation.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts which are necessary to dispose of this writ petition are recapitulated as under:-

( 3 ) IT is alleged that the petitioner is a leading and an eminent Neurologist of the country and he is the Honorary Physician to the President of India. On 20. 3. 1999 he purchased a Tata Safari vehicle on hire purchase basis with a loan of Rs. 6,23,000 from the 3rd respondent finance company. It Is mentioned in the petition that against the said loan a total sum of Rs. 7,38,692. 10 has been paid by the petitioner.

( 4 ) IT is also Incorporated In the petition that the petitioner has paid all the 36 instalments. The last Instalment was paid on 20. 2. 2002. In April, 2002 the pet












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top