SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1644

K.S.GUPTA
MASTER KUNAL – Appellant
Versus
HARSH DEV SHINGHARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN SHARMA, D.C.Vohra, J.P.Sengh, N.N.DHINGRA

K. S. Gupta

( 1 ) I heard Sh. J. P. Sengh for plaintiff, sh. D. C. Vohra for defendants 1, 2 and 8 and sh. N. N. Dhingra for defendants 5 and 7 on the issue if requisite court fee had been paid by the plaintiff.

( 2 ) PRAYERS made in the suit are as under:-

" (A)DECREE of declaration declaring that the documents viz settlements, releases, bonds, gifts or wills executed by the defendants or Late Pandit Gian chand not bind the plaintiff qua his share in the suit properties being joint family properties as mentioned in paragraph No. 6 of the plaint;

(B)DECREE of partition, preliminary and final, of separate possession of plaintiff s 1/12th share in the suit properties set out in paragraph No. 6 of the plaint;

(C) Decree of rendition of account, preliminary and final directing the defendants to render accounts of the rental income and other profits derived from the suit properties detailed in paragraph No. 6 of the plaint;

(D) If the defendants contest the claim for partition and separate possession of share of the plaintiff a decree for meene profits at the rate of ra. 25,000 per month or such further rate as may be determined by this Hon ble court pendente lite and future till the decree


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top