SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1609

P.C.JAIN, USHA MEHRA
DHARMAPAL VERMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Barkha Babbar, K.K.Sud, MUKTA GUPTA, NIRAJ JAIN, SANJAY JAIN, Sunil Mehta

USHA MEHRA

( 1 ) DHARAMPAL Verma has assailed the order of his detention dated 24th August,2001 passed under Section 3 (1) of the Prevention of Illicit traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (hereinafter called PIT NDPS Act ). The said order was served on the petitioner on 31 st August,2001 while he was confined in Central Jail, Tihar, new Delhi.

( 2 ) THE impugned order has been assailed, inter-alia, on the grounds that: (1) the copies of the documents were not supplied in Hindi though demanded; (2) it amounts to double detention. (3) there were suppression of material facts and non-supply of documents,

( 3 ) IN order to appreciate the challenge, we may have a quick glance to the facts of this case. The petitioner was apprehended on 1 may,2001. Subsequently vide detention order dated 24 th August,2001 he was detained under PIT NDPS Act. The impugned detention order was passed with a view to prevent him from engaging in the possession and transportation of narcotic drugs in future. The case of the respondent is that on information being received, the Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter called NCB), conducted search of the person of Ms. Usha on 30th April,20













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top