SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1637

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL – Appellant
Versus
ROHIT JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT BANSAL, S.C.Kaushik

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

( 1 )

( 2 ) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for final disposal.

( 3 ) THIS batch of writ petitions has been filed by the petitioner impuging the orders of the appellate authority and raising a question of law as to whether the mere specification of the arrears of house tax in a house tax bill can given rise to a cause of action to the assessee to impugn the same before the appellate authority in so far as it relates to the arrears for which neither the assessment orders nor bills were impugned earlier.

( 4 ) THE premises in question bear No. MB-34, Inder Prakash Building, 21, barakhamba Road, New Delhi were originally purchased by one Master Sudesh behl (minor), beneficiary Trust and thereafter transferred to the respondent in pursuance to agreement to sell dated 20. 4. 2001. It is stated that vide the assessment order dated 22. 3. 97 assessment was completed for the years 19894990, 1990-1991, 1991-92 and the rateable value was fixed at Rs. 1,50,000/- and for the assessment years 1989 to 1999-2000 notice are stated to have been issued for each assessment year but no objections were filed by the assesse and the same rateab

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top