SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1626

MANMOHAN SARIN
SUPERCOM INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOREIGN TRADE,MINISTRY OF COMMERCE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL SHARMA, Jayant Bhushan

MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) PETITIONER seeks quashing of order dated august 4, 1998, passed by respondent No. 2 i. e. the appellate Committee, Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, maintaining the penalty of Rs. 5 lace on the petitioner for non fulfilment of the export obligations. Petitioner also seeks a restraint on the respondents from recovering the penalty amount of Rs. 5 lacs.

( 2 ) THE facts, in brief, culminating in the present petition are as under: petitioner M/s Supercom India Ltd. obtained a letter of approval from the Government of India to set up an industrial unit in the Noida export Processing Zone inter alia for the manufacture of carbon film resistors. The approval was given vide letter dated 1. 1. 1988, and as supplemented by the letter dated 27. 1. 1992,by which the net average value addition was reduced from 31% to 20. 32%. Petitioner was required to export its entire production and the net average value addition was put at 20. 32% as noted above. The other terms and conditions for grant of approval were specified and set out in the two letters, which required the petitioner to take possession of the allotted plot as also to obtain clearances from the Pollution Co
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top