SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1745

MANMOHAN SARIN
KUNAL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANINDER SINGH, NISHAKANT PANDEY, SANDiP SETHI

MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) RULE. WITH the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.

( 2 ) THE question arising for consideration is whether a doctor, with an M. B. B. S. degree, having deficiency of colour blindness,is to be debarred from pursuing any post graduate Medical Course? The concerned Medical College denied admission to the petitioner in M. D. (Pathology ). The Director General of health Services and the Committee of Experts opined that the petitioner being totally colour blind cannot be considered for admission in Post Graduate Course in anaesthesiology, Psychiatry and Community Medicine.

( 3 ) HERE are the facts:-

(I) Petitioner is a Doctor, who completed his M. B -B. S. from Nalanda Medical College, Patna, bihar. Petitioner earnestly desired to pursue higher studies. Accordingly he appeared in the. All India quota, Post Graduate Entrance Examination. Result was declared in the month of February, 2002.

(II) Petitioner qualified and ranked at no. 1308. Petitioner opted for the M,d. (Pathology) in the counselling. He was asked to report to l. L. R. M. Medical College, Meerut. Petitioner duly appeared before the college authorities and was offered m. D. (Path





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top