SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1867

C.K.MAHAJAN
TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY,L. P – Appellant
Versus
A. K. DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PRAVIN ANAND, SANDiP SETHI, V.P.Singh

C. K. Mahajan

( 1 ) BY way of this application, the plaintiff seeks to amend the plaint to include paragraphs 20a and 20b as set out in paragraph 5 of the application.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are that the plaintiff is running a television channel under the trademark HBO/home BOX OFFICE since November, 1972. In March, 1996, plaintiff learnt that defendant No. 2 proposed to launch a cable television programming service under the mark CBO/cable BOX OFFICE. Accordingly, the plaintiff filed the present suit for permanent injunction, passing off, etc. against the defendants.

( 3 ) IT is stated that during the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff launched HBO channel in India in March, 2000. At the time of institution of the suit, the channel of the plaintiff was not available on cable television in India. Therefore, the plaintiff seeks leave to amend its plaint by inserting paragraphs 20a and 20b in the plaint as set out in the application.

( 4 ) THE amendments sought for are opposed by the defendant Nos. 1 and 2. It is stated that the present application has been filed by the plaintiff to delay the disposal of the suit after having obtained an injunction in its favour. The application has


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top