S.MUKERJEE
ANIL BHASIN – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR BHASIN – Respondent
( 1 ) AN interesting question has arisen regarding the interplay of the provisions of the Sections 2 (a), 3 (2) and 4 (3) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 by which Sections 81 and 82 in Chapter IX of the Indian trusts Act, 1982, were deleted in the year 1988, while side by side with the enacting of the Benami Act.
( 2 ) THIS application (I. A. No. 8243/2001) has been preferred by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking leave to amend the plaint, by incorporating inter-alia, the following prayers: i. Plaintiff wishes to add sub-para to the existing para 3, which is as under:
"plaintiff respectfully submits that Smt. Raj Rani Bhasin had purchased certain immovable properties either in her name or in others name including the defendant No. 3. The properties purchased by her in others names were held in trust as trustee. The same were held in fiduciary capacity and for the sole benefit of Smt. Raj Rani Bhasin. The same also devolved upon the parties hereto and are liable to be partitioned. It is submitted that Smt. Raj Rani Bhasin purchased property No. 2-R, Second Floor, DCM building, 16, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi, in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.