SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 67

A.K.SIKRI, ARUN KUMAR
ROOP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN THEDANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANINDER ACHARYA, N.K.KAUL, Pardip Nandrajog, R.P.Bansal

A. K. SIKRI

( 1 ) THIS Regular First Appeal is filed by the appellant, who was defendant in the suit, against judgment and decree dated 19/12/1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in Suit No. 256/91 filed by the respondents (plaintiffs in that suit) thereby decreeing the said suit in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendant/appellant. The impugned decree runs as follows:

"a) a decree for Rs. 5,500. 00 is hereby passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant in respect of commission charges for the period from 14/10/1977 to 31/03/1978 Rs. 1,000. 00 p. m.

(B) a decreeforrs. 25. 500. 00 is hereby passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant in respect of commission charges for the period from 1/03/1978 to 1 4/03/1980 Rs. 1,000. 00 p. m. and subject to payment of proper court fee;

C) a decree for Rs. 2,500. 00 is hereby passed for damages for use and occupation of premises for the period from 15/05/1980 till 14/10/1980 and subject to payment of proper court fee in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant;

D) a decree for possession in respect of shop No. 15a/16-1 Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi as described in the




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top