SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1

S.K.MAHAJAN
BALA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
MICHAEL G. RIKHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.D.GUPTA, R.P.SHARMA

S. K. Mahajan

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF filed a suit for injunction against the defendant on the allegations as contained in the plaint. The suit was registered on 7. 4. 1998 and summons were issued for 15. 4. 98. For 15. 4. 98, the defendant was not served and summons were, therefore, again sent to the defendant for 17. 4. 98 . On 17. 4. 98, the court held that the defendant had refused to accept the summons and he was, therefore, proceeded ex-parte. The ex-parte evidence was directed to be led on 12. 5. 98. On 12. 5. 98, the plaintiff appears to have taken an adjournment and the matter was, therefore, adjourned to 25. 8. 98 for leading ex-parte evidence. The matter was, however, taken up on 15. 5. 98 on an application of the plaintiff for early hearing. The application was allowed and the matter was, therefore, preponed to 22. 5. 98 for ex- parte evidence. On 22. 5. 98, ex-parte evidence by way of affidavits was filed and the matter was adjourned to 18. 9. 98. It appears that an application was again filed by the plaintiff for early hearing which was taken up on 25. 5. 98. The application was allowed and the matter was adjourned to 29. 5. 98 for arguments. On 29. 5. 98, the court passed an






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top