V.S.AGGARWAL, B.A.KHAN
STATE OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH CHAND – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS, appeal is said to be delayed by 136 days and appellant had not even chosen to seek condonation. Confronted with this L/c for appellant sought to justify the delay by falling back upon provisions of Section 378 (5) Code of Criminal Procedure which prescribed six months limitation period for filing acquittal appeal by a public servant complainant in cases instituted upon a complaint. This provision, according to her, provided six months to appellant to file the present appeal which had also emanated from a complaint and was thus filed within time. L/c for respondents, however, repelled this to claim that Acquittal Appeal of State was to be filed within 90 days from the date of acquittal order under A. 114 of the limitation Act. She sought support for this from Supreme court Judgement in "state Vs. Dharampal (JT 2001 (9) SC 136 ).
( 2 ) THE relevant provision reads thus :-
"378 (4) if such an order of acquittal is passed in any case instituted upon complaint and the High Court, on an application made to it by the complainant in this behalf, grants special leave to appeal from the order of acquittal, the complainant may present such an appeal to the High court.
(5) No ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.