SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 195

R.C.CHOPRA
AJIT SRIMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALAKH KUMAR, H.S.PHOOLKA, M.S.BUTALIA, RAKESH MALHOTRA

R. C. CHOPRA

( 1 ) THIS petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the orders dated 15. 11. 2000 and 9. 12. 2000 passed by learned trial Court directing the petitioner not to leave the country without prior permission of the Court and thereafter allowing his application for going abroad subject to furnishing a Bank guarantee in the sum of Rs. 2. 00 lacs.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is facing a trial before learned Metropolitan Magistrate under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It is true that under the orders of the high Court, trial of the complaint case has to be expedited, but in such like cases where identity of an accused is not in dispute, the trial can be conducted in the presence of a duly authorised counsel also after exempting an accused from personal attendance on the basis of a properly moved application. However, the fact remains that the petitioner, who is involved in a bailable offence only, has no sufficient reasons to flee from justice in exactly similar matter, a learned Single Judge of this Court in anup S. Khosla Vs. The State (N. C. T. of Delhi), 2000 (1) JCC (Delhi) 206 has clearly held that such conditions are harsh



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top