SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 188

MUKUL MUDGAL, DEVENDER GUPTA
ASHOK KUMAR BATRA – Appellant
Versus
SIMI KATYAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.BHASIN, SANJAY JAIN, SUNIL AGGARWAL, Vijay Kishan, VIKRAM JAITLEY

DEVINDER GUPTA

( 1 ) THESE appeals have been preferred by the defendants against the order passed on 16. 8. 2000 by learned Single Judge on the application filed by the plaintiff/ respondent under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short "the Criminal Procedure Code. " ). By the impugned order ex parte ad interim order of injunction was confirmed subject to the condition of the plaintiff depositing in Court within six weeks the entire balance consideration of Rs. 23,00. 000. 00.

( 2 ). Facts in brief are that on 7. 8. 1996 the plaintiff filed a suit seeking a decree for specific performance of agreement by directing the defendants to execute necessary transfer documents in her favour, pursuant to the agreement, which had been entered into between the plaintiff and late Shri Nanak Chand. Decree has been claimed, inter alia, alleging that on 6. 5. 1995 an agreement was entered into between her and late shri Nanak Chand by which Nanak Chand had agreed transfer property No. A-67. Saraswati Vihar, Delhi-110034 for consideration of Rs. 25,00. 000. 00 out of which a sum of Rs. 2,00. 000. 00 was paid as earnest money and the balance payment of rs. 23,00. 000. 00 was














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top