SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 259

MANMOHAN SARIN
NARINDER KUMAR VAID – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) RULE. WITH the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal.

( 2 ) BY this writ petition, petition seeks a mandamus, restraining the respondents from interfering, in any manner, with his possession of Plot No. R-262 and R-263, situated at Ramesh Park, New delhi, earlier numbers being Plot numbers 46-47 of j Block, situated in Khasra No. 57/13, Khureji Khas, Delhi. The immediate provocation for the petitioner to file the writ petition was that officials of the Corporation, in the month of July, 1998, sought to restrain the etitioner from carrying out any construction on the said plot.

( 3 ) PETITIONER claims that on enquiry being made by the SDM and other officials, he informed them that he was the owner of the plot and showed them the documents of title. Petitioner further claims that the municipal officials, later on, threatened him that they would remove the barbed wiring and fencing put up by the petitioner.

( 4 ) RESPONDENTS case, on the other hand, is that the said land was acquired vide Award No. 22/70-71 and, as such, the land vested in the state and the petitioner, even if he purchased the said land from the previ









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top