SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 381

A.K.SIKRI
DUGGAR FIBER PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.RAINA, N.S.Dalal

A. K. Sikri

( 1 ) IT appears that this IA was not numbered by the registry inadvertently. Let it be numbered.

( 2 ) PETITIONER had filed the objections under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration act, 1940 (the "act" for short) which was registered as Suit No. 990-A/92. By order dated 3/02/1995 direction was issued that the arbitration agreement be filed. Mr. Gian Chand Jain, a retired Judge of this Court was appointed as the Sole arbitrator to decide the disputes raised in the petition. Although with this order nothing survived as far as main suit was concerned, however, it appears that as petitioner had also filed IA No. 2399/92 along with the Suit in which petitioner was praying for interim order. By order dated 3/02/1995 it was directed that respondent shall not discontinue the electricity of the petitioner on account of non-payment of the disputed bill (subject matter of arbitration) till the award is made by the learned Arbitrator. The petitioner was however required to furnish a Bond for the sum in question within two weeks from the date of order to the satisfaction of the Registrar of this Court. It appears that the matter was kept pending because of this reason inasmuch as f














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top