SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 394

A.K.SIKRI
CANARA BANK – Appellant
Versus
SURYA CHEMICALS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.AGRAWAL

A. K. SIKRI

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF-CANARA Bank has filed this Suit for recovery of Rs. 604026. 39p against the defendants. Its a mortgaged Suit under Order XXXIV of the Code of Civil procedure and is based on the basis of the following averments :-

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF is a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer and Undertakings) Act, 1970 having its Head office at 112, J. C. Road, Bangalore. It has its branches throughout India including the one at Tagore Garden, New Delhi. Shri T. S. Prabhu is the duly constituted attorney of the plaintiff-Bank is also one of the Principal Officer of the plaintiff-Bank. He is conversant with the facts of the case and as such is in position to depose about the correctness or otherwise of the facts mentioned in the plaint. He has an authority to sign and verify the plaint and instituted the suit on behalf of the plaintiff-Bank. Defendant no. 1 is a proprietorship firm. Shri Inder Kapoor is its proprietor. Defendant no. 2 is a guarantor for the entire advance granted by the Bank alongwith interest and other expenses and is jointly and severally liable. The defendant no. 3 is also guarantor and has mortgaged her property b












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top