SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 406

MANMOHAN SARIN
ASHOK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
VIMILA MANCHANDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
LOKESH SAWHNEY, M.S.Sahni

( 1 ) PETITIONER Shri Ashok Kumar Malik has filed this petition under Section 8, read with section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, seeking appointment of Shri S. K. Choudhury, Advocate, as an arbitrator and reference of the disputes with the respondent for arbitration to the said Shri S. K. Choudhury. It is further prayed that in the event of the respondent not agreeing to the appointment of Shri S. K. Choudhury as the arbitrator, any other independent person may be appointed as the arbitrator by the Court.

( 2 ) PETITIONER is stated to have entered into a partnership with the respondent Smt. Vimla manchanda, under the name and style of M/s. Aastha (India) International. A partnership deed dated 1. 7. 1989 was executed between the parties. The said partnership deed was one at will and could be dissolved at any time with the mutual consent of the parties. The partnership deed also contained an arbitration clause in the following terms;

"clause 13= Resolution of Disputes: that dispute, if any, arising between the partners, whether in respect of the accounts or in the interpretation of this partnership deed, shall be referred to an arbitrator to be appointed with mutual consent












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top