SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 457

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
ALL INDIA LAWYERS UNION (DELHI UNIT) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK AGARWAL, AVINASH AHLAVAT, Barkha Babbar, Vaishali Mehra

Arijit Pasayat

( 1 ) THESE two writ petitions have been filed in public interest by an association of lawyers highlighting certain aspects relating to the desirability of enforcing certain provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short the Act) in the matter of information to be given to the Tribunal regarding accidents by the police officials, as statutorily mandated under the Act. It has also been prayed that directive should be given to enact rules specifying procedural aspects and modalities in this regard.

( 2 ) CERTAIN suggestions have been given to effectively combat traffic congestions, effective provision of medical aid to victims of accidents, action against erring drivers and early payment of compensation. It need not be impressed that Parliament from time to lime has introduced amendments in the old Act as well as in the new Act in order to protect the interest of the victims of the accidents and their heirs if the victims die. One such amendment has been introduced in the Act by (he aforesaid Amendment Act of 54 of 1994 by substituting sub-section (6) of section 158, which provides:

"as soon as any information regarding any accident involving death or bodily injury









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top