SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 523

R.C.CHOPRA
SKIPPER BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MOHINDER NATH DUDEJA, T.L.Kapur

R. C. CHOPRA

( 1 ) THIS petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "code" only) is directed against an order dated 2. 2. 2001 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, delhi declining the request of the complainant/petitioner to make over the complaint to the police under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal procedure for registration of FIR and investigations in accordance with law.

( 2 ) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

( 3 ) THE facts relevant for the disposal of this petition, briefly stated, are that the petitioner company had filed a complaint under Section 380, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B Indian Penal Code against two accused and some unknown persons alleging that in the course of the business, some blank cheques signed by a Director of the Company used to be kept in the office for withdrawal of money for urgent needs. Accused No. l and 2 were employees of the company. After they had left the employment of the petitioner company, some records including a cheque were found missing regarding which a notice even was served upon accused No. 2. A complaint was made to the Manager o










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top