SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 687

A.K.SIKRI
MINU CHOPRA – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK CHOPRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MINAKSHI LEKHI

A. K. SIKRI

( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 18 and 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 for grant of maintenance as an indigent person under the provisions of Order XXXIII read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code. The respondent has not appeared despite service and accordingly by order dated 8th March,2001 he was proceeded ex-parte. The petitioner was permitted to file affidavit disclosing the assets in her possession. Evidence by way of affidavit has been filed by the petitioner stating that petitioner is not in possession of sufficient means to enable her to pay Court Fee and in fact she does not own any moveable and immovable property. In view of these averments made on affidavit and there being no rebuttal or opposition, I am satisfied that the petitioner is not possessed of sufficient means to enable her to pay the Court Fee in the instant Case. The prayer to sue as an indigent person is allowed. I. A. No. 1646/2001 stands disposed of. Let this I. P. A. be registered as a suit by the Registry.

( 2 ) THIS application has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for grant of interim maintenance







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top