SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 597

R.C.CHOPRA
SARKAR SAHEB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PUNIT BHARDVAJ, SUNIL KAPUR

R. C. CHOPRA

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of the revision petition filed under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "the Code" only) by the petitioner against an order dated 22. 2. 2001 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi by which the application for grant of anticipatory bail moved by the petitioner was allowed subject to the condition that he would deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000. 00 in the Trial Court.

( 2 ) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and also gone through the records of the case.

( 3 ) RELYING upon the the Judgements in Ashok Malhotra and Others Vs. State 1994 JCC 301 and Moti Ram and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1978 SC 1594, learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the condition in regard to the deposit of Rs. 50,000. 00 cannot be sustained and as such, should be set aside. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand has contended that Section 438 of the Code under which the order for anticipatory bail was passed in favour of the petitioner, clearly ostulates attaching of reasonable and as such, the prayer of the petitio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top