SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 692

B.A.KHAN, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
RAJINDER SINGH SEHRAWAT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AVINASH AHLAVAT, MIRA CHHABRA, Vaishali Mehra

M. S. A. SIDDIQUI

( 1 ) CHALLENGE in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is to the validity of the order dated 22/04/1998 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal bench, Delhi (for short the Tribunal ) in O. A. No. 1564/97 on a petition filed by the petitioner for quashing some adverse entries made in his Annual Confidential Report (for short "the ACR") For the year 1995-96.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed as Head Constable (Ministerial) on 2/06/1976. On 17/02/1986, the petitioner was, duly promoted to the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Ministerial ). His earlier ACRs for the period from 2/06/1976 to 1994-95 have been excellent wherein he has mostly been given b grading with an occasional a . However, respondent No. 3, who was the Reporting Offiper,made some adverse entries in the petitioner s ACR for the year 1995-96 and these entries were also endorsed by the DCP (respondent No. 3 ). These adverese entries were communicated to the petitioner on 3/07/1996. The petitioner filed representation for their expunction, which waft rejected on 30/07/1996. Aggrieved thereby the petitioner filed OA No. 1564/97 before the tribunal for quashing t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top