SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 715

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
HINDUSTAN CARBIDE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Jay Kumar, Umesh Sharma

Delhi High Court

(MAY 28, 2001) 2001 (TLS)125174

2001-DLT-94-331 :: 2001-AD (Del)-5-910

HINDUSTAN CARBIDE PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. National Capital Territory of Delhi

VIKRAMAJIT SEN

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 17b of the industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as the act ) by the workmen. The proceedings were adjourned at the instance of learned counsel for the Petitioner for effecting a compromise. Today there is a prayer for an adjournment on the ground that Mr. Singla is out of couuntry. Due to repeated adjournments granted at the instance of the Petitioner the request for an adjournment la declined.

( 2 ) RELIANCE ie now placed by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner on a decision of a Single Judge of punjab and Haryana High Court in Punjab State electricity Board, Patiala through Secretary Vs. Presiding Officer. Labour Court. Bathinda. VOL. C (1991-2) Punjab LBN Reporter 591. In particular paragraph 11 thereof is relied upon. It reads as follows:

"11. The only question which remains to be decided is whether respondent-workman would be entitled to any wages from the date of the award till the decision of this case. The motion Bench had stayed the operation of t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top