SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 796

J.D.KAPOOR
PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SKYLINK CHEMICALS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JANAK SHARMA, PAILAVI PARMAR, Sunil Goyal, VIKASH SINGH

Delhi High Court

(July 12, 2001) 2001 (TLS)125344

2001-DLT-93-143 :: 2001-AD (Del)-6-256

PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA Vs. Skylink Chemicals

J. D. Kapoor

( 1 ) DEFENDANT has challenged the territorial jurisdiction of this Court to try this suit and by way of an application under Order 7 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil procedure has sought return of the plaint to the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE defendant is a private limited company having its registered office at Bhavnagar 1 It approached the plaintiff sometime in the month of April 1996 with a view to have business relationship. As a result of various discussions the defendant appointed him as its representative/agent initially for the Northern Region. Amongst other terms and conditions it was also agreed between the parties that the billing of material would be done by the defendant directly on various clients and documents shall be negotiated directly to such clients as per terms and conditions of the purchase order. It was further agreed that the defendant shall settle the commission amount every quarter by way of cheques. Plaintiff has sought recovery of Rs. 15,14,872. 50 p. towards commission for the period ending 31st of March, 1998.

( 3 ) THE pla




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top