SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 890

J.D.KAPOOR
TBWA ANTHEM PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MADHUKAR KAMATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ADITYA TIVARI, ANAND SRIVASTAVA, R.P.DAVE, SANJIV SARASVAT

Delhi High Court

(July 26, 2001) 2001 (TLS)125466

2001-DLT-93-302 :: 2001-AD (Del)-6-457

TBWA ANTHEM PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. Madhukar Kamath

J. D. Kapoor

( 1 ) THIS is an application moved by defendant No. 2 for deletion of its name as it is not a necessary or proper party. Admittedly, suit has been filed on the basis of agreement dated 1. 12. 1998 between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1 for the breach of said agreement.

( 2 ) THE impleadment of defendant No. 2 is based upon following facts :-

"the defendant No. 2 is also an advertising agency engaged in activities which are in competition with Plaintiff Company, and would have extremely profitable and beneficial use of the confidential and sensitive information of its competitors (such as plaintiff company) wrongly received, unlawfully and in an inappropriate manner through defendant No. 1. defendant No. 2 in gross violation of all business ethics and industry practice entered into collusion with defendant No. 1, and being aware of the position that defendant no. I was fully aware and privy to various confidential and highly sensitive information in respect of the business, operations, profit plans etc. of Plain- tiff Company , enticed d











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top