SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 778

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
DIWAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.T.Malik, MUKTA GUPTA

Delhi High Court

(July 10, 2001) 2001 (TLS)125246

2001-DLT-94-526 :: 2001-AD (Del)-6-818

DIWAKAR Vs. State (National Capital Territory of Delhi)

ARIJIT PASAYAT

( 1 ) THIS application under Section 407 of the code of Criminal Procedure ( code for short) is for transfer of the case relating to FIR No. . 179/97, u/s 302/34 INDIAN PENAL CODE, presently pending trial before Shri d. C. Anand, Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma courts, Delhi, to the court of Shri Ajit Bharihoke, presently Presiding Judge, MACT, Karkardooma Courts, delhi. The main ground on which such a prayer has been made is that prosecution as well as defence evidence has been closed and statement of the accused has been recorded in terms of Section 313 of the Code and, therefore, trial is practically over. Since the evidence has been recorded by Shri Bharihoke, it is just and proper that finality to the trial should be given by him.

( 2 ) WHEN the matter was placed before the learned Single Judge, it was noticed that in another matter i. e. Crl. M. (M) No. 3174/2000, a reference has been made to a larger Bench, doubting the correctness of view expressed by another learned Single Judge in sushil Sharma v. State [crl. M















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top