SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 866

V.S.AGGARWAL
MADHO PARSHAD – Appellant
Versus
RAM KISHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJIV NAYAR, RAVI GUPTA, Valmiki Mehta

Delhi High Court

(July 23, 2001) 2001 (TLS)125534

2001-DLT-94-254 :: 2001-AD (Del)-7-72

MADHO PARSHAD Vs. RAM KISHAN

V. S. AGGARWAL

( 1 ) MADHO Prasad, the plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendants. The facts alleged are that there is a piece of, land measuring 2866. 6 sq yrde forming part of khasra no. 52 in village Masoodpur village. Initially the land was owned and possessed by one Roshan Lal and his relatives. There were duly executed sale deeds in their favour and mutations had been filed in their names. During the consolidation proceedings in village Masoodpur the entire land was given which formed part/share of khasra no. 52 which is 40 bighas. The plaintiff had purchased the same before 20th october, 1956 for residential purpose and therefore the matter was not covered by sub-section 3 to Section 3 of Delhi Land Reforms Act. the plaintiff is in physical possession of the said land. The said land is stated to have been urbanised on 1/11/1954.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff and other co-owners had instituted proceedings under the Delhi Land Reforms Act claiming the relief that the vesting of the land in favour of the government was illegal and without juri



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top