SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1006

MUKUL MUDGAL
KANIKA AGGARWAL (MINOR) – Appellant
Versus
N. C. T. OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN AGRAWAL, Kailash Gambhir, Nirmal Chopra, S.P.SINGH

Delhi High Court

(August 8, 2001) 2001 (TLS)125350

2001-DLT-93-756 :: 2001-AD (Del)-6-570

KANIKA AGGARWAL (MINOR) Vs. N. C. T. of Delhi

MUKUL MUDGAL

( 1 )

( 2 ) WITH the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up today for hearing.

( 3 ) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India seeks the petitioner s admission to the 11th Standard in Science Stream (Non-Medical) in the respondent No-3-School from which School she passed out from Class X. The petitioner s case arises from the refusal of the respondent No. 3, the Principal of St. Mark s School to grant admission to the petitioner to science Stream (Non-Medical ). The petitioner was instead offered admission in Commerce Stream. The petitioner has challenged this refusal on the ground that in spite of securing 62. 6% per cent marks in Class X she was not given admission. It is also averred that while there is no clear cut guidance in the Delhi Schools Education Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) and Rules to cover admissions to Science, Commerce and Arts (Streams) respondent Nos. 1 and 2, i. e. , Govt. of Delhi and Directorate of Education had issued instructions which stipulated that ail student






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top