SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 966

M.A.KHAN
SHAIL KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
SARASWATI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohit Khanna, RAVI GUPTA

Delhi High Court

(August 2, 2001) 2001 (TLS)126069

2002-DLT-96-131 :: 2002-AD (Del)-2-805

SHAIL KUMARI Vs. SARASWATI DEVI

MAHMOOD ALI KHAN

( 1 ) ON the request of counsel for the parties arguments were heard for final disposal of the matter. This revision petition raises a simple as well as a question of great importance to the subordinate courts as to whether in the trial of a civil suit during examination of a witness when a document is tendered in evidence and it is sought to be proved the question of admissibility of that document and marking of the exhibit thereon may be deferred till the stage of hearing of final arguments.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix of the cause is that the petitioner/plaintiff filed a civil suit for declaration that she was the sole and absolute owner of the disputed wall and also for grant of permanent injunction restraining the respondent from raising any further construction in the suit property. On contest by the respondent, the trial court framed the issues. The petitioner did not enter into the witness box herself. She examined her daughter Ms. Geeta Rohtagi as Pw-3 to prove her case. In her statement Ms. Geeta Rohtagi stated that the petitioner had execute































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top