SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1371

MADAN B.LOKUR
DIMPLE SINGLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKUL ROHTAGI, Navin Chawla, Rajinder Singh

ANIL DEV SINGH

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent Appeal directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 24/8/2001 passed in C. W. P. No. 4205/2001. By that order the learned single Judge dismissed the Writ petition of the appellant holding that there was no infirmity in the action taken by the respondents in transferring the appellant to Pune. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows :- the appellant is married to an advocate who practise law at Chandigarh. She has a child of one and a half years. The appellant joined the Indian Army as a short service commissioned officer in the Judge Advocate General s department on 8/3/1997. During the short span of four and a half years of her service career she is stated to have been transferred three times. On 27/9/1999 the appellant was posted as staff Captain (Legal) in the Judge Advocate General s department at New Delhi. After working against that post for a period of about loss than two years, the appellant was transferred to Headquarter Andhra Sub Area, Secunderabad, as officer Incharge, Legal Cell , by order of the Military secretary (MS 14 Branch) dated 21/5/2001. She was required to join her place of posting by





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top