SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1220

VUENDER JAIN, VIJENDER JAIN
RUCHI PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN FLAME ENTERPRISES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.P.SINGH, S.K.BANSAL

Vijender Jain

( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS have filed this application under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code, inter alia, praying that plaintiff no. 1 is in the business of manufacturing and marketing of wide range of food preparations for human consumption including soya flour and other food articles made of soya since 1978 and has been selling and marking the said goods under the trade name RUCHI, which it has used along with trade mark nutrela in an artistic label. Plaintiff no. 1 adopted the said trademark in the year 1978 and continuously, commercially and in the course of trade used the said trade mark since then till date as its proprietor and through its licensee being plaintiff no. 2 under licence agreement dated 8/8/1991.

( 2 ) IT was contended before me by Mr. Bansal, learned counsel for the plaintiff that the plaintiff/applicant has been using the said mark in a distinctive label having distinctive artistic features including artistic get up, make up, colour scheme and lettering style. For that plaintiff also holds copyrights under Registration no. A-26732/80. It has been contended by Mr. Bansal that ruchi forms an essential key, distinguished and ma




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top