High Court Of Delhi
AUTO PEX MOTOR COMPANY - Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK SETHI - Respondent
Interim Application 4963 of 2001
Decided On : 09/10/2001
Trade Mark - Dispute over 'Master' label - Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 78, 79 - Summary: The court addressed a dispute over the use of the 'Master' label for gaskets, with the plaintiff claiming exclusive rights to the trade mark. The defendants contested the plaintiff's registration and alleged misrepresentation. The court found that the plaintiff had prima facie case and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the 'Super Master' label for gaskets.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff, a partnership firm, claimed exclusive rights to the trade mark 'Master' label for gaskets. The defendants contested the plaintiff's registration and alleged misrepresentation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the 'Super Master' label for gaskets.
Issues: Dispute over trade mark registration, alleged misrepresentation, and use of similar trade mark by the defendants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that despite non-registration of the trade mark application, the civil suit was maintainable, and the plaintiff had the right to file the suit to protect the trade mark from unauthorized use.
Final Decision: The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the 'Super Master' label for gaskets.
( 1 ) THEY admit that they are borthers but love has been lost so much between them that no suggestion to patch the disputes has found favour.
( 2 ) PLAINTIFF (Auto Pex Motor Co.) is a partnership firm consisting of two partners Ramesh Chand Sethi and Kapil Sethi. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of gaskets (auto goods ). It is the sole proprietor of trade mark "master Label" in relation to gaskets. During the course of business the plaintiff also started using the trade mark Super Master and Gold Master. The predecessors of the plaintiff had adopted trade mark "master" in relation to gaskets in the year 1970 and continuously used the same upto 24/3/1994. The trade mark was assigned to the plaintiff vide deed of assignment of 24/8/1994. The plaintiff has continuously been using the said trade mark. M/s Auto Pex Sales India was the predecessor of the plaintiff.
( 3 ) THE plaintiff in order to acquire statutory rights for the trade mark Master obtained registration and filed application for its registration. The trade mark was initially registered in the name of Auto Pex Sales. After it was assigned to the plaintiff it filed an application for bringing the said registration in the name of Chandermohan Sethi and Ramesh Chand Sethi, partners of the plaintiff. Plea has been raised that Chandermohan has since retired from the partnership and Kapil Sethi became the partner in the firm from 1/1/1999. An application was filed for recording the said assignment. The plaintiff claims that it has been using the trade mark "master" label for a long duration. The defendant is engaged in the business of manufacture and marketing the gaskets and have adopted the trade mark Super Master label. Defendant no. 1 is the proprietor of defendant no. 2. The said label "super Master" label has only been adopted recently by the defendants. The defendant even filed a criminal complaint against the plaintiff u/s. 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. It is alleged that the defendant cannot use a similar trade mark Super Master Label and hence the present suit has been filed to restrain the defendants, his agents or servants from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale the gaskets under the trade mark Super Master label and similarly it is prayed that defendants should be restrained from selling, offering for sale, advertising or displaying articles with the same name (Super Master label ).
( 4 ) DURING the pendency of the civil suit IA 4963/2001 has been filed seeking ad interim injunction on the above lines. By this order the said interim application is proposed to be disposed.
( 5 ) IN the written statement filed along with the reply to the above said interim application the defendants have contested the matter. It is asserted that plaintiff does not have any registration in their name. They have only applied for registration of the trade mark. The plaintiff is deliberately alleged to have not disclosed his relationship with defendant no. 1. The trade mark "master" belonged to the father of defendant no. l and Shri R. C. Sethi. The five sons of the father of defendant no. 1 are using the trade mark Master in same form since the very beginning. There is misrepresentation and concealment of facts by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is alleged to be only targeting the defendant by filing the present suit. It is pleaded that in the year 1973 the word Master was used for the first time by Auto Pex Sales and Agencies by Inder Sain Sethi, R. C. Sethi and C. M. Sethi. The trade mark Master was registered in 1973. In the year 1976 C. M. Sethi started his proprietorship business under the name Auto Pex Motor Co. Master Gaskets. Shri Ramesh Sethi is one of the partners of the plaintiff had signed several invoices issued by Sethi brothers. In this process, the defendant no. 1 had also started using the trade mark Super Master label. It is stated to be in no way infringing the right of the plaintiff.
( 6 ) IT
referred : M/s Modi Threads Ltd V. M/s Som Soot Gola Factory and Anr.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.