R.C.CHOPRA
SUSHIL ANSAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE (CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION) – Respondent
( 1 ) MORNING of June 13, 3997 was as bright as ever but the evening turned out to be the darkest for those whose kith and kin had gone to the matinee show at Uphaar Cinema. A fire in a transformer emitted thick smoke and toxic gases, which asphyxiated 59 patrons to death besides injuring over 100 in the balcony of the cinema. The agony, grief and the sorrow of those who lost their nears and dears in this tragedy can never be adequately compensated but the law enforcement agencies and justice delivery system come under a heavy duty to find out the cause of the incident, persons responsible for the cause and then proceed against them all in accordance with law.
( 2 ) IN Crl. R. 238/2001 filed on behalf of petitioner Sh, Sushil Ansal former Managing Director of m/s. Green Park Theatres Associated Private Limited, which had built and established Uphaar Cinema, the prayer is to discharge him of the charges framed against him by the trial Court under Sections 304-A, 337, 338 read with Section 36 of Indian Penal Code and section 14 of Cinematograph Act, 1952. In crl. R. 175/2001 also filed by Sh. N. S. Chopra, Manager of uphaar Cinema, the prayer is for discharge. He has been
Atyachar Virodhi Parishad V. Dalip Nathumal Chordia and Another
Century Spinning and Manufactureing Co, Ltd. V. The State of Maharashtra
State of Bihar V. Ramesh singh
Union of India V. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Another
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi, Advocate V. Jitendra Bhimraj Rijja and Other
State of Maharashtra, etc. V. Som Nath Thapa etc.
Satish Mehra V. Delhi Adminstration and Another
Privy Council 72, Kurban Hussein Mohamedalli Rangawalla V. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.