SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1311

M.A.KHAN
ABDUL QADIR – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMND SAGHIR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NEMO K.PARASARAN, S.M.Aquil

Mahmood Ali Khan

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed assailing the order of a Civil Judge dated 24. 5. 2001 whereby he had restored a civil suit under Order 9 Rule 9 Code of Civil Procedure and has condoned the delay in filing the application for restoration under section 5 of Limitation Act.

( 2 ) MS. SAIDEN Begum (who has died and is represented by her legal representatives, the respondents) had filed a civil suit for recovery of possession and mesne profits against the petitioner in 1987. The petitioner has contested it. Ms. Saiden had filed another civil suit against one Mohammad Hafeez Proceedings in both the suits were being conducted on the same day one after the other. These suits were fixed for evidence of the plaintiff on 17. 5. 1999. On that day one of the plaintiffs was present.

( 3 ) ONE witness was also present. But due to the absence of their counsel, the case alongwith the second suit was adjourned to 8. 9. 1999 for evidence of the plaintiff. Inadvertently, the adjourned date was wrongly noted by the court staff as 8. 7. 1999 on the file cover of the suit of petitioner. As a result this suit was taken up on 8. 7. 1999 and was dismissed for non-appearance of the pla









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top