SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1531

V.S.AGGARWAL
GOOD VALUE ENGINIRS – Appellant
Versus
M. M. S. NANDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Bhasin, CHETAN DUTT, George Thomas

V. S. AGGARWAL

( 1 ) THE short question that seeks an answer is as to whether in the facts of the case in hand the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would apply.

( 2 ) THIS question arises on basis of the facts that on 22/11/1995, M/s. Good Value Engineers (for short "the applicant") submitted, by notice to the engineer-in-Chief, Kashmir House, Rajaji Marg, New delhi, seeking that in face of the disputes, arbitrator should be appointed. The arbitrator was appointed and Notice had been issued by the arbitrator in December 1996. The award has been pronounced on 4/11/1997. Needless to point that the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 came into force on 16/8/1996. Earlier to that/the President had promulgated the arbitration and Conciliation Ordinance on 16/1/1996. With effect from 16/1/1996, the Arbitration Act, 1940 had been repealed.

( 3 ) IT is on the strength of these facts that it had been urged in terms that since notice to appoint the arbitrator had been issued on 22/11/1995, therefore, the arbitral proceedings had started from that date onwards and consequently, the provisions of the arbitration Act, 1940 would continue to




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top