SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1461

P.C.JAIN
KHAZAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.N.AGGARWAL, NEMO K.PARASARAN

R. C. Jain

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, dated 15/3/2000, thereby allowing the defendants application under Order 9 Rule 7 Civil Procedure Code and setting aside the order of ex-party proceedings subject to payment of Rs. 2,000. 00 as cost.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY, the relevant facts leading to the present revision petition are that the petitioner/plaintiff herein has filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant viz, Union of india through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, government of NCT of Delhi through its Chief Secretary.

( 3 ) THE defendants were served with the summons of the suit but they absented and so were ordered to be proceed ex-parte vide an order dated 19/8/1999. Ex-parte evidence was recorded on 6/10/1999 and the case was adjourned to 8/10/1999 for arguments. On the adjourned date none was present and, therefore, the case was adjounrned to 19/11/1999 for arguments/orders. On 19/11/1999 appearance was put in on behalf of the defendants through counsel and the case was. adjourned to 25/11/1999 for further proceedings. On 24/11/1999 an application under Order 9 Rule 7 was filed on behalf of t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top