SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1446

DEVENDER GUPTA, MUKUL MUDGAL
BHURIA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GITA MALHOTRA, PI.KI A.A.D

DEVINDER GUPTA

( 1 ) THESE 37 appeals have been preferred by the claimants as well as by Union of India under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act. 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) - Claimants have sought further enhancement in the amount of compensation whereas Union of India in the appeals filed by it is claiming reduction in the amount of compensation. Some of the claimants have filed cross objections also in the appeals filed by Union of India seeking further enhancement in the amount of compensation.

( 2 ) CONSIDERABLE land situate in village Masoodpur was notified for being acquired for public purpose,, namely ; Planned Development of Delhi on the basis of notification issued under Section 4 of the Act on 24/10/1961. Declaration had not yet been made under section 6 of the Act with respect to the land which was notified for being acquired on 24/10/61 when; another notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on 23/1/965 notifying further land for being acquired for public purpose at public expense, namely. Planned development of Delhi.

( 3 ) FOR part of the land notified on 24/10/1961 declaration under Section 6 was made on 5/5/1966 for which the Collector ma





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top