SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1576

O.P.DWIVEDI
VIJAY KUMAR AHUJA – Appellant
Versus
LALITA AHUJA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohan Singh, S.K.BANSAL

O. P. DWIVEDI

( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose of I. A. No. 6268/2001 (Order 39 Rules 1 and 2. Civil Procedure Code) filed by the plaintiff and I. A. 5461/2001 (O. 39 R. 4 Civil Procedure Code) filed by the defendant.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts leading to these applications are as follows:- plaintiff Mr. Vijay Kumar Ahuja has filed this suit against his brother s wife Mrs. Lalita Ahuja seeking ad interim injunction restraining her from dealing in luggage,items and other allied, and cognate goods under the trade mark, MISTER, DEFENCE, ARUN and ML or any other identical and/or deceptively similar mark thereby amounting to passing off the defendant s goods for those of the plaintiff and also from infringement of copyright it is alleged in the plaint that plaintiff is carrying on business of manufacturing and marketing of various kinds of luggage items Under the name and style of Vijoy industries. The plaintiff. has been using its trade marks namely MINISTER, DEFENCE, ARJUN AND ML in respect of different types of luggage items. It is pleaded that, the said trade marks were originally adopted by the plaintiff in the year 1992 in respect of those goods and that the plaintiff h


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top